What's that? Other people can, but not me? I
gotcha. That's fair.
Who is Jake Ellis? is a fantastic book.
It feels like the hybrid of a 1970's spy movie with the kind of USA
TV show you would watch because you're too drunk to get off of the
couch. It's pure entertainment wrapped in a high concept that manages
to work. Instead of feeling like a gimick, it feels like a new kind
of spy thriller. Dancer is what happens when that high concept fails.
In a way it should be a slam dunk. The
doppleganger is a class film noir trope. Considering that this story
takes place in Europe, that sort of connection with German
expressionism and France's post-war fascination with the American
genre films they missed out on, you have a very smart set of texts to
play around with. Then you layer on something like Metal Gear Solid,
which includes the same kind of plot device to get moving, Dancer
should be an excellent. You look at all this and you think "Hey, this should be good, this should work."
And then it doesn't.
It doesn't work because I don't care. I won't go into what the concept is supposed to be as removing the surprise might smother what little life this story has in it. But it doesn't work because it's a silly idea, the reason this story doesn't work is that the plot and the characters are paper thin. So, while all of this action is going down and then there's the silly high concept waving to you in the background, reminding you of just how silly this entire story is. It's a refrain that I've been hearing a lot lately. In a way it's good to see that comic book
Oh, no, wait, it's the opposite of that.
Speaking of characters, though the villain doesn't
work and if the villain doesn't work in a story like this, then it's
bad news for the reader. Bad news indeed.
Bond
had Goldfinger and Jaws. Bourne
had Chris Cooper and Brian Cox. What you got here? Some kind of
half-assed Khan Noom Singh (or is this a half-assed Hannibal Lector)?
Come now, really? It doesn't work in the same way that the rest of the
book doesn't work. It never quite comes together, never quite gets out
of first gear.
Then there's the ending, which without sounding like a smartass, is the best thing in the book, but it's exactly the same as
every single one of the Bourne movies and, it's 2013, do we really
need to be biting Bourne's style? Why would you ever want to draw comparison to those movies?
Dancer simply shows how great of a book
Who is Jake Ellis? was and what a nice surprise that was. While the art works quite well, the story drags it down. It also reminds us that the best way
to bite Jason Bourne's style is to make a fantastic movie. But not every story can be Casino Royale, can it?
Now, if you'll excuse me, I want to post this because it uses the word "dance" in it--
Now, if you'll excuse me, I want to post this because it uses the word "dance" in it--
Absolutely agree. I loved Jake Ellis and was pretty disappointed in Dancer. The art is often stellar though. Those first few pages of issue 1? I mean--DAMN.
ReplyDelete